Anthropometrics: An introduction

Anthropometrics An cosmosBiomechanics Lab ReportThis lab report is based on the Anthropometrics realistic academic term that took place in week three. IntroductionThe aim of the session was to turn over upon bring step up what our Anthropometrical measures were and how they would comp ared to some typical figures that were blessn come out at the time.The subject of Anthropometrics deals with the measure handst of the dimensions, mass, and mass distri only whenion of the human bole. It provides estimates of the lengths, masses, hole of the centres of mass, and moments of inertia of the human eubstance that are utilize in the study of human motion There are 10 main split of the corpse that leave behind be metric during the study of Anthropometrics and they are the two forearms, the head, the two upper arms, the trunk, two t extravagantlys and two shanks. All these measurements pull up stakes give us an indication whether we are fit and salutary or if we are under load or overweight, . Anthropometrics was lay down by a French initiate called Alphonse Bertillon who in 1883 gave the name Anthropometrics to a system that he knowing which compound him taking certain measurements and when they were recorded he name out that both single individual could be distinguished from other people by these measurements. This is because he concluded that everyone has a different physique and rise up area.Materials and ruleThe equipment that was employ during this practical session were things bidGoniometers A plinth few CalipersA Height pass judgmentA set of ScalesA mag tape measureNomogram old bag Strength GaugeGoniometers are designed for the measurement of limb angular movement. The sensors are attached across the interchangeable employing double-sided medical adhesive tape and connected to instrumentation. The sensors are lightweight an unnoticeable allowing the data of human activity to be displayed or recorded patch leaving the subject t o move freely in the commonplace environment.The set-back thing that we did was to calculate our body mass magnate and to do this we measured our height and weight by victimization a Height Gauge and a set of scales. Then we calculated our body mass world power by multiplying the height by itself and wherefore dividing the answer that we got by our weight and this gave us our body mass index. Then we measure the length of our stagecoachs by using a tape measure. Then we measure the greater Trochanter knee joint and the Lateral Malleous knee joint by using Calipers. We to a fault used the Calipers to measure the breadth of our wrist, elbow, knee, ankle and armspan. Then we used a goniometer to measure the angle of our quadriceps. Then we used the calipers to measure our skin passel thickness. Then we used the grip strength gauge to see how safe we were. We used the plinth to measure the lower part of the body. For example we used it to measure our lower limbs. We did the me asurements that are above except for the height, weight and body mass index first on our right side and then on our left side and this enabled us to find out the add measurements of the entire body. Finally we checked our surface area by using the nomogram.ResultsAnthropometrical MeasuresValueHeight (m)185cmWeight (kg)72.8 kgBMI (kg/m2)21.3 kg/m2 unexp closureed RightLeg Length, ASIS Medial Malleolus (m)101 m101 mGreater Trochanter-articulatio genus Joint (m)45 m45 mKnee Joint Lateral Malleolus (m)43 m43 m articulatio radiocarpea width (m)5.7 m5.9 mElbow width (m)7.3 m7.3 mKnee width (m)10 m10.2 mAnkle width (m)7.6 m7.4 mArmspan (m)185 m185 mQ angle1010,Chest/Waist/Hip Circumference mChest90 mWaist79 mHip 86 m Waist to Hip Ratio (WHR)0.91 whrRatio Armspan to body height 1 cmCalf Circumference (m)35 m35 mT spunky Circumference (m)47 m46 mGrip Strength Ratio (L vs R)3426 out Area (Nomogram)1.91 m2Surface Area by calculation1.93 m2 Skin show up thickness (rectus femoris)85Measure t he symmetry of ring finger lengthto index finger length m0.925 m0.924 mDiscussion objet dart analysing my results I found out that some of my results were convention and some of my results were infra or above the bonnie for that particular measurement. For example when I analysed my body mass index I found out that I was in the normal range for body mass index which was 20-25 kg/mTypical ranges for body mass indexUnderweightHealthy melt20-25 kgm2D Overweight25-30 kgm2Obese30 kgm2 plot analysing my results I found out that my skin fold thickness is lower than the normal average. For example the average skin fold thickness for a fit man is 14-17 percent whereas if you realize a body fat percentage over 25+ you are classed as obese. On the other hand women allow have a slightly higher body fat percentage than men because they have got a slightly wider physique than men and this gist that women will have a higher body fat percentage.Skin fold thickness measurements are also us ed as an indication of corpulency and it has been proven to be a more reliable method to find out how much fat we have in our bodiesTypical determine for body fat percentageWomen % body fatMen % body fatFit 21-24 %14-17 %Obese32 + %25 +%While analysing my results I also found out that my q angle was lower than a normal q angle should be. For example a normal q angle should typically fall between 18- 22, with males usually at the lower end of the scale and females at the higher end of the scale. An abnormal Q angle will typically be increased from normal. This automatically increases the vulnerability to tracking problems like lower back, pelvis, leg and foot problems. An abnormal Q angle becomes further manifold when accompanied by a in operation(p) or anatomical neat leg. Many people especially runners favour a functional succinct leg rather than anatomical short leg. They prefer a functional short leg to an anatomical leg because the functional leg is used to straighten an a bnormal q angle whereas an anatomical leg just keeps it in place. In this case a heel raise is often recommended but this will make the problem worse by keeping the leg in an abnormal position when it should be in a normal position. A normal Q angle will have the patella revolve slightly more towards the mid line than the tibial tubercle. Also time analysing my waist to pelvic arch result. I found out that I am at a low jeopardy of being overweight and get a serious health problem. For example a man of necessity to have a waist to hip ratio of 0.90 to be at low risk of getting a serious health assure but if a man has a waist to hip ratio of more than 1.0 than he is classed as being at a high risk of getting a serious health condition. In similitude to this a woman needs to have a waist to hip ratio of less that 0.80 to be at a low risk of getting a serious health condition and if they have a waist to hip ratio of more than 0.85 then they would be classed as being at a high ri sk of getting a serious health condition. The types of health conditions that you could get if you are at high risk are things like Coronary Heart Disease, Hypertension and Diabetes. On the other hand there are some serious health conditions with being underweight and they are Osteoporosis, Diabetes, Infertility, Anorexia / Bulimia, Aneami and Aimmune Deficiency. These conditions mainly affect women who have a body mass index of less than 18.5.kgm2When my results was compared with the averages for the different measurements I found out that they were below the normal average for some of the measurements and this is because everybody is different in many ways. For example people have different physiques so the inwardness of body fat that is found in a persons body varies and this means that everybodys body mass index will be different.ConclusionWhile concluding my results I found that I am fit and healthy and that I am in no danger of getting a serious health condition. I have also found out that there are a number of different conditions that affects people who are overweight and underweight. I have also concluded that everybodys Anthropometrical measures will be difference. This is due to the difference in physique, height, body mass and the surface area of the body. When I compared my results to some typical data I found out that I was around about the normal range for just about of the measurements that were taken during the practical session.Reference PageBooksPheasant, T S, (1996), Bodyspace Anthropometrics, Ergonomics, and the design of work, London, Taylor FrancisHall, J, S (1953) Basic Biomechanics, London, Human kineticsWebsites http//www.chiroweb.com/archives/21/24/03.htmlwww.biopac.com/s/sitesearch/runsearch.php?q=goniometer 28kwww.worldchiropracticalliance.org/tcj/2004/jun/charrette.htmwww.nth.nhs.uk/dtrack.asp?r=docs/presentations/Podiatric%20Biomechanics%20-%20A%20Hardy.pptwww.brianmac.co.uk/injury.htm