The Nazi Doctors Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The national socialist Doctors - Essay vitrineIn fact, they had a task of eliminating the great unwashed that were considered unfit for work, while others were sacrificed for others to live. Therefore, this period entails complications regarding rules that were altered frequently in accordance with camp commandants. Nevertheless, the paper will focus on analysing this issue based on the supposition whether the famous philosophers, Aristotle, Kant, and Mill would agree with the practices in which Nazi animates were involved. Aristotle, Kant, and Mill do non agree with practices conducted by the Nazi doctors by the agree workforcet of their medical professional. In this case, they were chosen to take role of concentrating camp doctor and miserliness lives of numerous people while making decision regarding condemning others to death. On the other hand, two Aristotle and Mill would support the argument that the Nazi were not in a position to decline the draw out of position allo wed by the Nazi regime. In fact, the doctors were bound to admit these offers as a way of saving their own lives. Others agreed with the notion that they would increase the possibility of benefiting numerous people. As a utilitarian, Mill has a conviction that actions are considered right based on their aspect of promoting happiness while wrong leads to rue or unhappiness ((Mill, 2010). Therefore, causing death for innocent people created a difficulty, thus failing to keep up with the Greatest Happiness Principle. Moreover, Aristotle sought to offer a better notion to support this idea, whereby indicating that wise people are able to bare kinds of fortune in a seemly way thereby playing in an aristocrats way in various situations (Amemiya, 2007). However, Kant disagrees with the idea of doctors agreeing to the mandates given to them by the Nazi regime. This is due to his maxims conviction, which is universalized without incompatibility (Cahn, 2012), whereby if it prevailed the d octors would not have had a chance to make their Faustian bargain. Moreover, Kant (1964) argued that a mans self-worth is lost by lying thus, decisions, which concern determining, people who will live or die does not require to be accommodated in the law or universalized maxims. In this case, the cardinal philosophers were advocating for a world that facilitated coexistence whereby each human being lives without being subjected to death that would be caused by another human being. Difficult choices regarding face of a substantial number of choices was made by Aristotle and Mill, whereby they stood for consequentialism. In this case, there was not chance for Kant to commit a philosophical justification of the murder for some people for the sake of saving others. In fact, he advocates for deontological ethics that focuses on peoples intentions (Honderich, 2005). Therefore, Kants convictions do not support the killings perpetrated by Nazi doctors despite the idea of saving other p eoples lives. Furthermore, this is an attitude, which can be supported through a verse in the Bible at Matthew 712, Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do you even so to them. Concerning the choice of whether I would support the actions of Nazi doctors or the offer that was presented to them by the Nazi regime is a problem that required deep thinking. However, the analysis on the three philoso